[P4-dev] detect port status changes in the dataplane?

Roshan Se roshan.sedar at student.uclouvain.be
Thu Jul 6 05:00:23 EDT 2017


Hi Antonin,

Could you give bit more information on this : query_port_status(<dest 
field>, <port number>)?

What do you mean <dest_field> here?

I'd like to give it a try to implement failure status detection in 
simple_switch.

Thanks,

Roshan.


On 2017-06-27 19:51, Antonin Bas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is no mechanism in the P4 v1model to query port status. This is 
> the architecture (to use the P4_16 terminology) which bmv2 
> simple_switch tries to support, so the short answer to your question 
> is no. There is however a mechanism to send port status updates to the 
> control plane.
> AFAIK, the Portable Switch Architecture (PSA), which aims to replace 
> v1model as the de facto architecture to write portable P4 programs, 
> will not include such a mechanism either.
>
> That being said, bmv2 itself is supposed to be a framework for 
> implementing various P4_16 architectures. So were you inclined to 
> define your own architecture and include an extern type that enables 
> you to query the status of a port, it should not be too hard to 
> implement your architecture using the bmv2 C++ library. The major 
> issue I see here is that the p4c compiler bmv2 backend is still a work 
> in progress and doesn't support arbitrary architectures with arbitrary 
> externs at this stage. So you would not be able to compile your 
> programs easily. Once the backend is more stable (which IMO means once 
> the backend supports PSA), you should be able to do what you are 
> trying to do with some amount of work.
>
> If you are using P4_14 and the legacy compiler for bmv2 
> (https://github.com/p4lang/p4c-bm), it may be much easier to achieve 
> support for this. You would simply need to define your own primitive 
> action and implement it in C++ in bmv2 simple_switch. Your primitive 
> action could look like this: query_port_status(<dest field>, <port 
> number>). Now the C++ implementation may not be trivial, as you would 
> need to get a handler on the bmv2 PortMonitor object, but that 
> wouldn't be too hard either. If you are interested in trying this, 
> there should be quite a few email threads on the mailing list that 
> cover how to add a custom primitive action to the P4_14 compiler and 
> implement it in bmv2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antonin





More information about the P4-dev mailing list