[P4-discuss] parser or pipe

Peng He peng.he.2000 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 31 10:43:58 EDT 2017


Cool! Thanks Andy.

Regards,
Peng

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Andy Fingerhut <andy.fingerhut at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I believe you are right, given the sample P4 code that appears before that
> text.  The struct type InControl that contains the field inputPort is an in
> parameter to the control named 'Pipe', but is not an input to the parser.
>
> I have created a pull request changing 'parser' to 'match-action pipeline'
> in that sentence, here: https://github.com/p4lang/p4-spec/pull/365
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Peng He <peng.he.2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Just a minor question in the P4_16 spec, bottom of page 16 section 5.2.1,
>> shouldn't the ‘parser’ in ‘… the arbiter block sets the inCtrl.inputPort
>> value that is an input to the parser with the identity…’ be
>> ‘match-action pipeline’ to match the Figure 6? Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peng
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> P4-discuss mailing list
>> P4-discuss at lists.p4.org
>> http://lists.p4.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-discuss_lists.p4.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p4.org/pipermail/p4-discuss_lists.p4.org/attachments/20170731/c2329230/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the P4-discuss mailing list